Tuesday, February 14, 2012

AOW (Joey & Megan)

Summary: There has been a recent emphasis on math and reading since the NCLB rule. Since the early 90s, there has been little increase in these two areas even though teachers have tried to prepare students for their standardized tests. In math, teachers have focused on showing students how to yet the answer, which inadvertently led to teachers not teaching the understanding behind the calculations. 

I personally loved having calculators in math. I took up to Pre-Calc, and I also took Chemistry and Physics in high school. I have always been told that math is to teach problem solving skills. There is no reason why using a calculator and knowing how to use it is not problem solving. I believe the same goal can come from using them then not using them. I am not going to use parabolas or matrices in real life.

I find the statistics for both math and reading in the past 20 years sad. I am wondering why it took this long to realize the strategies that have been used have not been working. They should have been trying other methods. There is still a rather large gap between ethnic groups--and this needs addressed as well. Math is supposedly a "universal language", so I would not think there would be a large gap in the scores.

Math is a little frustrating to me, especially as I plan to take the Praxis I test sometime this year. I will have to recall information that I have not touched in four or more years. I do not believe that this is an adequate assessment to see if I am prepared for teaching or not. With this said, I really hope my math teacher in high school was able to give me what I need to pass this test many years later.
Koebler, Jason. (2011). National Math Assessment Scores Creep Up But Stagnate in Reading. U.S. News. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/high-school-notes/2011/11/01/national-math-assessment-scores-creep-up-but-stagnate-in-reading

Phillips, Anna M. (2012). For Math, Click Calculate. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/education/edlife/for-math-click-calculate.html

No comments:

Post a Comment